OpenSSL Missing Cryptographic Step Vulnerability - CVE-2026-45446

Issue summary: The implementations of AES-SIV (RFC 5297) and AES-GCM-SIV (RFC 8452) mishandle the authentication of AAD (Additional Authenticated Data) with an empty ciphertext allowing a forgery of such messages. Impact summary: An attacker can forge empty messages with arbitrary AAD to the victim39s application using these ciphers. AES-SIV (RFC 5297) and AES-GCM-SIV (RFC 8452) are nonce-misuse-resistant AEAD modes: they accept a key nonce optional AAD (bytes that are authenticated but not encrypted) and plaintext and produces ciphertext plus a 16-byte tag. On decrypt EVP_DecryptFinal_ex() is documented to return success only if the tag is verified succesfully. In OpenSSL39s provider implementation of these ciphers the expected tag is computed only when decryption function is invoked with non-empty data. If the caller supplies AAD and then calls EVP_DecryptFinal_ex() without invocation of the ciphertext update which can happen when the received ciphertext length is zero the tag is never recalculated and still holds its all-zeros value. When AES-GCM-SIV is used an attacker who sends arbitrary AAD empty ciphertext and all-zeros tag passes authentication under any key they do not know single-shot. When AES-SIV is used for mounting the attack it39s necessary for the application to reuse the decryption context without resetting the key. AES-SIV is implemented since OpenSSL 3.0. AES-GCM-SIV is implemented since OpenSSL 3.2. No protocols implemented in OpenSSL itself (TLS/CMS/PKCS7/HPKE/QUIC) support either AES-GCM-SIV or AES-SIV. To mount an attack the applications must implement their own protocol and use the EVP interface. Also they must skip the ciphertext update when a message with an empty ciphertext arrives. The FIPS modules in 4.0 3.6 3.5 3.4 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue as these algorithms are not FIPS approved and the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.