Continuously test your applications and APIs, confirm exploitable vulnerabilities with runtime evidence, and focus security efforts on the risks that matter most.
Security teams face more vulnerability findings than they can investigate. To prioritize, teams must know an issue is reachable, exploitable, and important to the business.
Large backlogs make it harder to identify the findings that need attention.
Security teams spend time investigating vulnerabilities without conclusive evidence.
Technical severity alone doesn't show which exposed systems matter most.
Unverified findings and manual handoffs delay action on real risks.
Invicti combines offensive testing, runtime validation, and application intelligence to help security teams distinguish confirmed vulnerabilities from potential risks and set defensible remediation priorities.
Identify security weaknesses across running applications and APIs with automated offensive testing.
Separate exploitable vulnerabilities from potential risks with evidence from running applications.
Focus security efforts on the threats that matter most using runtime evidence and risk intelligence.
Get the right vulnerability to the right developer with context.
“We can fire up Invicti, run the tests as often as we like, and mitigate to our hearts’ content. The budget we were spending every year on penetration testing decreased by approximately 60% almost immediately …
“As opposed to other web application scanners we used, Invicti is very easy to use and does not require a lot of configuring. An out of the…
“Start integrating Invicti into your process and you’ll be surprised at how much time it saves you and how much ‘auto magic’ it brings to your entire development pipeline …
Invicti combines static findings with runtime context from DAST. When a SAST finding is confirmed exploitable by DAST, it can be elevated in priority; findings without supporting runtime evidence can be deprioritized. Reachability and business-impact context are then applied to generate a shorter list of real risks.
Reachability helps determine whether vulnerable code or components are actually part of an executable path in the application. Invicti combines reachability with exploitability and business-impact context so teams can distinguish theoretical exposure from risk that is more likely to affect a running application.
Invicti overlays DAST and SAST findings onto dependency call graphs to correlate verified runtime vulnerabilities with the code paths that expose them. This allows teams to prioritize SAST findings that are tied to proven runtime risk and give developers exact code-level remediation context.
Invicti uses intelligent correlation and deduplication to merge related findings across DAST, SAST, SCA, container security, and other scanners. This prevents the same underlying issue from appearing as multiple separate alerts and creates a more unified view of application risk.
Static analysis and contextual signals can estimate whether a vulnerability is likely to matter. DAST adds outside-in runtime evidence by testing the running application and confirming exploitability where possible. That runtime validation acts as an additional layer of proof rather than relying on severity or static context alone.
Business context helps distinguish two technically similar findings that carry very different organizational risk. Application criticality, project context, exposure, sensitive data, and other business factors can be used alongside technical signals to determine which vulnerabilities should move to the top of the remediation queue.
Invicti connects prioritized findings to developer workflows by mapping findings to vulnerable code locations, providing context-aware guidance, and integrating with source repositories and issue-tracking workflows. The goal is to move directly from prioritized risk to a developer-ready fix.
