
Invicti vs. Escape comparison
Organizations need a scalable, risk-based application security program that covers their entire web app and API attack surface—and Invicti’s DAST-first platform helps them achieve exactly this.
The software is an important part of my security strategy which is in progress toward other services at OECD. And I find it better than external expertise. I had, of course, the opportunity to compare expertise reports with Invicti ones. Invicti was better, finding more breaches.
Senior Analyst, OECD
Invicti vs. Escape at a glance
Comprehensive AppSec platform vs. niche API tool
Invicti is an enterprise-grade application security solution that combines its native DAST, IAST, dynamic SCA, and API security on a unified platform and adds SAST, static SCA, and Container Security via partner integrations. It is purpose-built for modern web apps and APIs, with deep capabilities for web application vulnerability scanning, automation, remediation workflows, and integration into DevSecOps pipelines. Uniquely, it also incorporates web asset discovery as well as multi-layered API discovery.
Escape, by contrast, is narrowly focused on API security (GraphQL in particular) and business logic fuzzing. Despite marketing itself as a full dynamic application security testing (DAST) tool, application scanning support is limited to API-backed frontends. There’s no support for broader application testing scenarios such as full-stack scanning, authenticated workflows, or complex user sessions. Organizations need to secure their entire attack surface—and Escape can only cover a small fraction of it.
Invicti supports a far wider range of application security needs, including:
- Vulnerability scanning across a wide range of applications and technologies, including SPAs and other JavaScript-heavy web apps
- Vulnerability scanning for REST, SOAP, GraphQL, and gRPC APIs
- Support for authenticated scans, including OAuth
- Integration with modern DevOps and CI/CD tools and workflows
- Thousands of mature security checks for active and passive detection of security vulnerabilities (including out-of-band detection)
Proven accuracy vs. unverified AI assumptions
Network scanners like Tenable Nessus can perform a few high-level checks related to your web presence, such as identifying vulnerable versions of web servers or known open-source platforms, but this is only scratching the surface of your web security posture. To check if your websites and applications could be compromised by attackers, a web application scanner is specifically equipped to map out all web pages and user inputs. Unlike a network scanner, it offers thorough vulnerability tests for security vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting (XSS), SQL injection, remote file inclusion (RFI), and more.
Invicti combines web asset discovery and advanced crawling with web application scanning and API security testing. As a DAST-based security platform that also provides optional IAST and dynamic SCA functionality, Invicti is the automated counterpart to manual penetration testing. At the same time, it also identifies security misconfigurations and outdated web technologies, much as a network scanner would when pointed at a web server. A web vulnerability scanner can run automatically or on demand to keep testing your web attack surface in between manual tests and automatically submit any identified security issues for fixing – but that requires accuracy.
Scalable integrations and mature workflows make all the difference
Security testing is not just about detection—it’s about integrating into the development lifecycle and helping teams fix real issues fast. Invicti offers deep SDLC integration, from scanning code pushed to Git repositories, to assigning issues in ticketing systems like Jira, to synchronizing scan results with vulnerability management platforms.
Escape, while offering some DevOps-friendly features, lacks the mature ecosystem support, scalability, and proven integrations that enterprise security teams rely on. It is primarily a point solution designed for security engineers already familiar with API schemas, not by any stretch a platform built to support entire AppSec programs.
Invicti enables streamlined vulnerability management and remediation through:
- Industry-leading set of 50+ out-of-the-box workflow integrations
- Predictive Risk Scoring to prioritize testing and remediation
- Proof-based vulnerability confirmation
- Extensive internal REST API for automation, customization, and orchestration
Enterprise-grade, DAST-first application security is the way
Invicti has been trusted for years by thousands of organizations, including government agencies, Fortune 500 companies, and global software teams. It combines the best of the Acunetix and Netsparker web vulnerability scanners into a single DAST-first application security platform with a proven track record of finding real-world vulnerabilities like SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), and authentication bypasses across diverse app and API environments.
Escape is a promising newcomer in the API space but remains unproven at scale. Its capabilities don’t even add up to a full-featured DAST tool but instead are focused on specific API types and use cases, relying on heuristic fuzzing with no reliable way to validate exploitability. For security teams that need repeatable, automated, enterprise-grade application security, Escape is no substitute for a real AppSec platform.
What’s the difference between Invicti and Escape?
Invicti is a comprehensive DAST-first application security platform with a proven track record and extensive web application and API security features. Escape is a specialized API security tool with some limited DAST capabilities.
Can Escape validate vulnerabilities like Invicti?
No. Invicti uses proof-based scanning to automatically confirm the exploitability of many vulnerabilities and provide solid evidence. Escape uses machine learning to reduce false positives but has no way to conclusively verify if findings are real.
Is Escape a full replacement for a DAST tool?
No. While Escape markets itself as a DAST solution, its scanning is limited to specific use cases related to APIs and API-heavy applications. Thus, it lacks the depth and breadth of functionality required to secure modern web apps.

We scan all our websites for vulnerabilities as they are being developed. These scans are also used to satisfy a yearly scanning requirement from our governing organization. We have identified and corrected over 100 vulnerabilities with Invicti.
CISO, Alabama Department of Education
Web scanner comparisons
In the 2018 independent web vulnerability scanners comparison, Invicti (formerly Netsparker) was the only scanner to identify all vulnerabilities and to report zero false positives.
Detect more vulnerabilities
When tested in third party benchmarks by security industry experts, Invicti (formerly Netsparker) identified all direct impact vulnerabilities, surpassing all other solutions. Their results show Invicti has the most advanced and accurate crawling & vulnerability scanning technology, and the highest web vulnerability detection rate.
SQL Injection Detection (SQLI)
100%
Detection Rate
136/136
False Positives Tests
0/10
Reflected XSS Detection (RXSS)
100%
Detection Rate
66/66
False Positives Tests
0/7
Local File Inclusion Detection (LFI)
100%
Detection Rate
816/816
False Positives Tests
0/8
Remote File Inclusion Detection (RFI)
100%
Detection Rate
108/108
False Positives Tests
0/6
Unvalidated Redirect Detection
100%
Detection Rate
30/30
False Positives Tests
0/9
Old Backup Files Detection
72.83%
Detection Rate
134/184
False Positives Tests
0/3
Trusted by companies like
Bruno Urban
I had the opportunity to compare external expertise reports with Invicti (formerly Netsparker) ones. Invicti was better, finding more breaches. It’s a very good product for me.

Perry Mertens
As opposed to other web application scanners, Invicti (formerly Netsparker) is very easy to use. An out of the box installation can detect more vulnerabilities than any other scanner.
Dan Fryer
We chose Invicti (formerly Netsparker) because it is more tailored to web application security and has features that allow the university to augment its web application security needs.
