Dynamic application security testing (DAST) can deliver measurable ROI by reducing breach risk, cutting false positives, and speeding up remediation. With Invicti’s DAST-first platform, organizations gain validated results, broad coverage, and centralized visibility that turn application security into a strategic business value driver.
Maybe more than any other area of cybersecurity, application security used to be considered a cost center, a necessary budget item with no easy way of demonstrating value. As cyber threats escalate and security budgets increase, so does the pressure on CISOs and security leaders to justify every dollar spent. It’s no longer enough to say a tool improves security: it needs to demonstrably reduce risk, cost, and operational drag.
Stakeholders across finance, procurement, and engineering want to know:
Dynamic application security testing (DAST) occupies a special place in the application security market because, if implemented and integrated the right way, it can provide all those benefits and more, both on the engineering and operational security side.
By providing automated dynamic scanning, DAST is uniquely positioned to drive ROI across multiple dimensions of software delivery and security operations.
DAST scans running applications in real-world conditions to uncover true, exploitable vulnerabilities before attackers do. This early detection helps to prevent costly breaches and security incidents that could disrupt operations or expose sensitive data. The logic is simple: catching a critical vulnerability in staging costs far less than cleaning up a breach in production.
Many security tools overwhelm developers purely with the sheer volume of alerts. If those alerts aren’t verified, teams waste a lot of time triaging non-issues. Invicti’s DAST tool uses proof-of-exploit to automatically validate many common classes of vulnerabilities to help you ensure that developers only work on real, confirmed risks. This saves thousands of developer hours per year and boosts trust in security processes.
The longer a vulnerability lives in code, the more expensive it becomes to fix. When integrated directly with CI/CD pipelines and dev tools, DAST can catch issues at earlier stages of the software development life cycle (SDLC). That means faster feedback, smaller context switches, fewer delays to delivery, and lower remediation costs compared to late-stage fixes.
From PCI DSS to HIPAA, regulatory frameworks now expect a continuous process for vulnerability testing. DAST provides an efficient way to fulfill key audit controls by providing documented, repeatable scans of your applications. With Invicti, you can generate audit-ready reports, track remediation timelines, and respond quickly to security questionnaires – all in-house and without reinventing your workflows.
Done right, DAST is far more than a checkbox item for compliance. When you’re running security testing in-house and getting real, actionable issues to fix, you’re doing measurable risk reduction – and that has a concrete and measurable financial impact. Here’s how to think about it.
According to IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach report, the cost of dealing with a breach and all its fallout now exceeds $4 million – and that’s just on average. For regulated industries, fines and reputational damage can drive that number far higher. DAST acts as a proactive control that may help you prevent many such incidents altogether. Averting even a single breach by fixing exploitable issues before deployment can pay for the tool many times over.
Traditional scanners generate dozens or hundreds of findings. Without validation, teams might spend anywhere from 1 to 4 hours manually isolating, reproducing, and assessing each one. Invicti’s proof-based DAST can greatly cut down on triage time by verifying many remotely exploitable vulnerabilities upfront. When you multiply the time saved per issue by your labor costs across a year of scanning, the cost reduction becomes substantial.
Developer time is expensive, and wasting it on unverified alerts, unnecessary rewrites, or ambiguous fixes has a very real cost. Invicti’s focused, validated findings help developers stay in the flow by fixing issues that matter, not chasing noise. This translates to:
DAST also reduces the cost of audit preparation and incident investigation. With consistent, automated scanning and remediation tracking, teams can:
Not all DAST tools deliver the same return. Invicti’s DAST-first application security platform is purpose-built to maximize value across security, engineering, and leadership teams.
The majority of high-impact vulnerabilities reported by Invicti DAST have been safely exploited by the scanner and are accompanied by a proof-of-exploit (and some even with a one-click proof-of-concept to reproduce the issue). This not only streamlines remediation and helps to prioritize it by risk but also builds trust between security and development.
Invicti integrates natively with GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD, Jenkins, and other dev automation platforms, helping to make security an inherent and efficient part of every build and release. The result is a continuous and automated application security process without added overhead.
Invicti is built around best-in-DAST scanning but goes far beyond it to cover the modern application attack surface. The platform combines dynamic testing with API discovery and security testing, software composition analysis and container security, and optional IAST for added depth. With application security posture management (ASPM) layered in, teams can also unify and orchestrate results across all their AppSec tools.
Together, these capabilities enable security teams to scan:
This unified approach means you get more visibility into realistic software risk without the complexity of stitching together multiple tools, managing separate vendors, and aggregating results from multiple scan sources.
From developers to CISOs, each team gets the insight they need:
This reduces overhead, aligns communication, and makes it easier to track performance over time.
AppSec spending shouldn’t always mean adding more tools. Instead, you should be putting your investment where it makes a difference. Invicti’s DAST-first approach puts validated and exploitable risks at the center of your security workflow. That translates to:
This is where development and InfoSec meet under one security umbrella – and where security investment turns into measurable risk reduction.
CISOs and AppSec leaders are no longer just being asked about the current security posture – they also need to show tangible value from their investments. With Invicti’s DAST-first platform, you can:
‍
Start with the cost of a potential breach resulting from a severe application vulnerability that went unnoticed in testing, got into production, and was exploited (in 2024, that was around $4M on average). Then factor in the time saved on verification, triage, remediation, audit prep, and avoided disruptions. Compare that to the licensing and operational cost of your DAST solution.
Not necessarily. While open-source DAST tools are free to acquire with no upfront licensing fees, they nearly always require significant investment in customization, deployment, maintenance, and optimization. Teams also spend more time dealing with false positives or incomplete results, which increases operational costs. These hidden expenses can outweigh the savings from a “free” tool.
No. Basic or immature scanners will detect some vulnerabilities but can generate high volumes of false positives, miss more advanced issues, and lack integration with developer workflows. That means extra manual verification, higher labor costs, and slower remediation, which erodes ROI. A mature, enterprise-grade solution like Invicti maximizes return by combining accuracy with automation and broad coverage.
Invicti DAST uses proof-based scanning to show which vulnerabilities are exploitable and need to be fixed as a priority. It also integrates into CI/CD pipelines and issue trackers to cut down on manual work and issue assignment, covering web apps, APIs, and open-source dependencies – all as the core part of a unified AppSec platform.
Yes. Mature DAST tools can support key regulatory requirements like PCI DSS, SOC 2, and HIPAA. Invicti also provides audit-ready reports and remediation tracking.
Absolutely, all these tool classes are complementary. Compared to SAST, DAST can find runtime vulnerabilities that static checks cannot see while also verifying runtime exploitability for SAST results. Compared to the runtime protection that RASP provides, DAST is proactive because it finds fixable vulnerabilities rather than reactively stopping incoming attacks.