Eliminating the false positive problem at scale with proof-based scanning
Security false positives waste time, slow down AppSec teams and devs alike, and break DevOps automation—but it doesn’t have to be like this. Proof-based scanning on Invicti’s DAST-first platform eliminates noise by automatically confirming real vulnerabilities to help security and development teams scale with accuracy and speed.
Your Information will be kept private.
Begin your DAST-first AppSec journey today.
Request a demo
Solving the false positive problem in enterprise AppSec
For enterprise security teams, false positives are more than an annoyance: they are a silent killer of automation, efficiency, morale, and risk visibility. In high-velocity DevSecOps environments where speed and accuracy are equally critical, the cost of triaging and investigating inaccurate vulnerability alerts adds up fast and equals costs and delays.
Invicti’s proof-based scanning deals with the problem of false positives in vulnerability scan results, allowing security teams to focus on real risks, streamline remediation, and scale up AppSec efforts without adding manual work.
Why false positives undermine enterprise AppSec
False positives are not unique to security tools, but the stakes are much higher for a security false alarm. Far from being a simple nuisance from a tool not working as expected, false positives can undermine the whole idea of systematic security testing and remediation.
The alert overload problem
Modern web environments can generate thousands of automated scan results. Without reliable automated validation, security teams must manually review each alert to determine its legitimacy, a process that is not only time-consuming but also demoralizing.
Endless triaging wastes time and resources
Manual validation drains precious hours from AppSec teams that aren’t getting any larger. Developers waste cycles investigating vulnerabilities that may or may not exist, and security analysts are pulled away from higher-value work for escalations and to give remediation guidance.
Alert fatigue increases real risk
When everything looks urgent, nothing feels urgent. Teams become desensitized, overlook valid issues, and risk leaving real threats unaddressed. False positives don’t just slow you down—they create dangerous blind spots.
False data breaks automation
You can’t have efficient and scalable security automation if every result needs manual inspection to ensure you’re not sending a false alarm into the dev pipeline. And if your security testing isn’t automated enough, you risk breaking dev automation as well.
AppSec needs grow faster than AppSec teams
Enterprises are managing hundreds—sometimes thousands—of URLs, APIs, and cloud assets, and they’re growing relentlessly. Meanwhile, security teams remain small and overextended. You can’t simply hire your way out of this problem if you don’t have tools that support accurate and scalable automation. That’s just the modern enterprise reality.
Legacy security tools can’t validate findings
Many vulnerability scanners were built for manual pentesting, not for automated penetration testing at an enterprise scale. They identify potential weaknesses based on signatures or patterns but lack mechanisms to verify findings. The most visible result is more noise.
Compliance requires provable confidence
Security teams are increasingly accountable for producing audit-ready reports. False positives inflate metrics, obscure trends, and complicate compliance with standards like PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and ISO. And when a certification pentest comes back with a long list of issues your teams should have found, the fixes required for compliance can get costly.
The strategic value of eliminating false positives
- Focusing on real runtime threats: Security teams can stop spinning wheels and start focusing on what matters: exploitable vulnerabilities that put systems and data at risk.
- Boosting DevSecOps momentum: By removing the friction created by noisy results, Invicti accelerates security integration into CI/CD workflows. Developers fix what matters, and pipelines flow smoothly.
- Demonstrating ROI in AppSec investments: Fewer false positives mean more efficient operations, faster time to remediation, and less strain on development teams. Leaders can show measurable value and improvement over time.
Proof-based scanning: The Invicti difference
The idea of proof-based vulnerability scanning came from the realization that the only surefire way to show a vulnerability is real is to exploit it and bring back proof. None of the early vulnerability scanners could do that, so Netsparker pioneered the proof-based scanning technology that is now at the core of Invicti’s DAST-first AppSec platform.
What it means to be proof-based
Invicti doesn’t guess, it verifies. Our proprietary scanning engine probes and safely exploits vulnerabilities whenever it’s technically possible, thus proving they are real and exploitable by attackers. Those confirmed results are high-confidence, actionable findings with embedded proof-of-exploit.
Far fewer false positives compared to competitors
Talking to customers, we hear they routinely see far fewer false positives after switching to Invicti from other DAST tools, typically up to 90% fewer. That translates to time reclaimed, distractions eliminated, frustration saved, and a clearer picture of your realistic security posture overall.
Read how accurate automation with Invicti saved one customer the equivalent of a full-time role.
Streamlined remediation workflows
When Invicti provides verified results as ready tickets, complete with practical guidance, developers trust the findings and can quickly implement an effective fix without back-and-forth or switching tools. This shortens the remediation cycle, fosters better collaboration between security and engineering, and improves your code quality in the long run.
Enterprise-ready from the ground up
Invicti supports role-based access, multi-tenant management, and integrates with industry-standard issue trackers and CI/CD tools, from Jira and Azure DevOps to GitLab and Jenkins. All this lets you set it up to work with your existing tools and team structures, and keep those verified vulnerability reports flowing into remediation pipelines without disruption.
Why Invicti’s DAST-first platform is the best choice for scalable AppSec
- Purpose-built for the enterprise: Whether you’re a global enterprise or a security consultancy managing multiple clients, Invicti scales with you. Proof-based scanning is core to the platform, not a bolt-on feature.
- Full-surface coverage: Invicti DAST covers modern web apps, APIs, SPAs, and legacy applications and adds IAST, static and dynamic SCA, SAST, and more. Combined with asset discovery tools, it ensures you can see, test, and secure your entire attack surface.
- No more guesswork: From automated validation to seamless ticketing and centralized reporting, Invicti shows you what’s real and lets you build a scalable, noise-free AppSec program.
Conclusion: Proof is what keeps AppSec scalable
False positives don’t just slow you down; they undermine your entire security program. At enterprise scale, the only viable solution is accurate automation backed by proof. Invicti eliminates the false positive problem at its root, enabling AppSec teams to operate faster, more accurately, and with greater confidence.
See how proof-based scanning can transform your AppSec efforts. Schedule a demo or talk to an Invicti expert today.
FAQs
What are false positives in application security?
False positives are scan results that report non-existent vulnerabilities. They waste time and create unnecessary work for security teams and developers alike. Note that “false positives” is sometimes also used to mean technically valid but non-actionable or irrelevant results.
Why do traditional scanners generate so many false positives?
Legacy vulnerability scanners rely on pattern-matching or incomplete heuristics and cannot confirm exploitability. Because most were designed as pentesting tools that should report any suspicious behaviors for further manual investigation, using them in automated workflows leads to a high proportion of false alarms and alert fatigue.
How does proof-based scanning reduce false positives?
Proof-based scanning is a proprietary Invicti technology that attempts to safely exploit weaknesses to confirm if a vulnerability exists and extract proof. This automated confirmation is performed for the majority of common vulnerabilities, including SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS). Any confirmed issue that can be exploited remotely cannot be a false positive.
What are the benefits of proof-based scanning at scale?
Vulnerabilities confirmed with proof-based scanning can go straight into an automated remediation pipeline with no risk of false positives, allowing for truly efficient and scalable security testing automation. When security issues are resolved like any other bug, security teams can manage more targets without growing headcount, improve accuracy, and focus on more strategic and higher-value work than manually reviewing scanner findings.
Does proof-based scanning mean I will never get a false positive?
Not all types of vulnerabilities can be automatically verified with proof-based scanning, so for some scan results, you will see a confidence percentage rather than a “Confirmed” mark. No security tool can guarantee undisputed 100% accuracy in all situations, but for confirmed issues, the risk of getting a false positive from Invicti is negligible (under 0.02%).
How does Invicti help enterprises manage large-scale security?
Invicti’s DAST-first platform combines proof-based scanning with IAST, dynamic and static SCA, SAST, API security, and more to give a unified view of application security. By integrating out-of-the-box with popular issue trackers, collaboration platforms, and CI/CD tools, Invicti brings provably accurate security insights to security and dev teams where they already work, enabling organizations to secure thousands of assets efficiently.
