AI adoption is accelerating, but with it comes a surge in threats like prompt injection, data poisoning, and shadow AI. Learn about the expanding AI attack surface, the role of AI-enhanced security testing, and actionable best practices to secure both AI systems and the applications that rely on them.
Artificial intelligence is no longer a future-forward experiment but is firmly embedded across enterprise ecosystems. From customer-facing chatbots to AI-assisted development pipelines, organizations are rapidly adopting generative AI (GenAI) and especially large language models (LLMs) to accelerate innovation. But with this adoption comes a rapidly expanding attack surface.
AI security demands attention on two fronts:
As AI adoption accelerates, enterprises must treat AI security not as an afterthought but as a foundational element of their security posture.
The unique risks posed by AI systems start with “traditional” application vulnerabilities like SSRF being exposed via AI components, but they also go much further. Threats such as prompt injection, model manipulation, and data poisoning bypass many existing defenses and expose organizations to operational, financial, and regulatory risks. The unprecedented speed and scale of AI deployments drives an urgent need for security improvements in several ways:
In addition to serving as an additional vector and vehicle for many existing attack classes, AI introduces new risks that attackers are already exploiting:
AI-driven tools are transforming how security teams detect and respond to threats. Behavioral analytics, anomaly detection, and predictive threat intelligence powered by AI can reduce false positives, automate incident response, and scale defensive coverage across hybrid and multi-cloud environments. For example, AI-assisted SOC teams could cut incident triage and reaction times, potentially allowing defenders to shift focus from repetitive tasks to high-value strategic analysis.
By embedding AI into dynamic application security testing workflows, security scanners can improve coverage, prioritize findings more intelligently, and reduce false positives through smarter validation. Accordingly, most vendors in the application security market are offering some type of AI-powered scanning, whether as the core scan technology or auxiliary features.
Invicti has taken a considered approach to AI-aided DAST by enhancing its proprietary, industry-leading scan engine with specific value-adding AI features to enhance scan accuracy, streamline triage, and accelerate remediation. These include smarter crawling, automated form filling, authentication, and more, giving customers a reliable way to keep pace with the growing scale and complexity of application and API environments.Â
Just as importantly, application security testing must evolve to address the risks introduced by AI-based applications. LLMs and AI agents create entirely new attack vectors that traditional approaches cannot cover. In its 2025 hype cycle report for AI and cybersecurity, Gartner predicts that more than half of successful attacks against AI agents through 2029 will exploit access control issues and prompt injection vectors.Â
To close this gap, organizations need security testing that can actively probe AI-specific weaknesses in addition to traditional web and API vulnerabilities. Invicti’s DAST scanner extends proof-based scanning into the AI domain, supporting detection of LLMs and testing for high-impact vulnerabilities such as prompt injection, leakage, and LLM-mediated command injections, alongside traditional web and API issues. This allows security teams to identify and validate real, exploitable issues in AI-powered applications before attackers can take advantage of them.
The result is a security strategy where AI strengthens both sides of the equation: helping to secure AI-driven applications while also using AI to make the security scanners themselves more efficient and effective.
Industry research highlights several persistent challenges:
Even just these challenges illustrate why proactive AI security strategies must be a board-level priority.
Enterprises can mitigate AI security risks through a combination of frameworks, technical safeguards, and cultural shifts.
AI has the power to revolutionize enterprise productivity and resilience, but only if it is deployed securely. As new risks emerge, from poisoned datasets to cross-tenant exploits to vulnerabilities opened up through prompt injections, organizations must prioritize AI-specific security measures while reinforcing traditional defenses.
By adopting structured frameworks, strengthening visibility, and embedding AI security testing into DevSecOps and InfoSec processes, enterprises can ensure that innovation does not come at the cost of exposure. Ultimately, secure AI is not just a technical requirement: it’s a trust imperative.
Get a demo of LLM security testing on the Invicti Platform
‍
AI security is the practice of protecting AI systems (including models, APIs, training pipelines, and data) and the applications that use them from cyber threats. AI can also be used in security to strengthen overall cybersecurity defenses.
Key risks include prompt injection, data poisoning, model manipulation, data leakage, credential theft, and vulnerabilities in AI development pipelines.
Mitigation strategies include input sanitization, prompt logging, and sandbox testing, but security testing is also vital, as there is no way to completely eliminate the risk of prompt injection. Frameworks like the OWASP Top 10 for LLMs highlight prompt injection as one of the biggest security risks for AI.
AI vulnerabilities can cause GDPR, CCPA, and EU AI Act violations through data leaks or biased outcomes, leading to fines and reputational damage. They also increase the overall attack surface and provide an additional attack vector, so demonstrating strong AI security is vital for overall security compliance.
Organizations can start with the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and OWASP Top 10 for LLMs, which provide structured guidance on mitigating AI risks.