Vulnerability scanning vs. penetration testing

Pentesting vs vulnerability scanning: What’s the difference?

When it comes to securing applications, two techniques often get mentioned together: vulnerability scanning and penetration testing. While both are critical components of a security strategy, they serve different purposes and each offers unique value. Understanding the difference is essential for building a proactive and efficient AppSec program.

What is vulnerability scanning?

Vulnerability scanning is an automated process that identifies known security weaknesses in applications, APIs, or systems. These tools typically scan for outdated software versions, misconfigurations, missing patches, and vulnerabilities in code or architecture. Dynamic application security testing (DAST) tools are a key category of vulnerability scanners, focused on testing the behavior of live, running applications.

Automated scanners offer scalability and continuous coverage, making them ideal for DevSecOps pipelines and agile environments. With modern tools like Invicti, vulnerability scanning can go beyond simple discovery, automatically validating issues to reduce false positives and helping teams prioritize real risk.

Vulnerability scanning tools

Vulnerability scanning tools are automated solutions designed to detect known security weaknesses in systems, networks, and applications. Most of these tools compare a target environment against a continuously updated database of known vulnerabilities, such as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), but DAST scanners also perform active security checks to identify previously unknown vulnerabilities in running applications.

Invicti (formerly Netsparker) and Acunetix stand out as the most effective and reliable solutions for web application and API security. Both are part of the Invicti Security family, combining deep technical expertise with industry-leading innovation to deliver results that go beyond basic scanning:

• Invicti is renowned for its accuracy, powered by proprietary proof-based scanning technology that automatically verifies vulnerabilities with real, safe exploits. This eliminates false positives and ensures development and security teams can focus on fixing true, actionable issues. Invicti also integrates seamlessly into modern DevSecOps pipelines, scaling across enterprise environments while maintaining high efficiency and low operational noise.
• Acunetix brings powerful and fast scanning capabilities tailored to small and midsize organizations, offering comprehensive coverage of web assets with an intuitive interface and strong automation features. Like Invicti, it includes advanced crawling, API scanning, and detection capabilities to help teams secure complex applications with confidence.

How much does a vulnerability scan cost?

The cost of vulnerability scanning varies widely depending on the delivery model, licensing structure, and operational complexity.

In-house vs. external solutions

External scanning services may be convenient for one-off or infrequent engagements but can quickly become costly and inefficient with more regular use, especially if the provider is simply running a tool you could just as well deploy in-house. You’re effectively paying a premium to outsource tasks your team could automate and control internally. With a reliable and accurate in-house tool, you gain continuous access, faster turnaround, and the ability to integrate scanning into your workflows—all without recurring service fees or external delays.

Licensing models matter

Licensing models can dramatically impact the total cost of commercial security tools. Traditional vendors often impose restrictive licensing with per-engine or per-environment charges that quickly multiply your expenses. Invicti breaks this paradigm by delivering unrestricted access to scan your entire application portfolio without arbitrary limitations. Unlike legacy platforms that bottleneck your security operations with concurrent scan caps, Invicti’s transparent licensing empowers unlimited simultaneous scans, eliminating delays and redundant costs. This approach is ideal for modern DevSecOps workflows where security must keep pace with rapid innovation.

The hidden cost of managing scan results

Cheap or open-source tools might seem attractive during budget reviews but can become expensive if they generate excessive false positives and other noise. Time spent triaging non-issues adds up quickly. Invicti’s proof-based scanning minimizes this by confirming exploitable vulnerabilities automatically to reduce noise and streamline remediation.

Ultimately, the real cost of scanning is the effort required to act on results. Tools that deliver accurate, actionable insights offer the best long-term value.

Benefits of a vulnerability scan

Vulnerability scanning offers several strategic and operational advantages that make it a key part of any layered security program:

• Speed and automation: Scans can be scheduled and automated, making it easy to maintain regular security checks.
• Breadth of coverage: Able to scan entire networks, operating systems, applications, and databases in a short time.
• Early detection: Helps identify known vulnerabilities before they’re exploited or even discover forgotten or abandoned web assets (if the scanner also provides discovery).
• Compliance support: Many industry regulations (e.g. PCI DSS or HIPAA) require regular vulnerability assessments.
• Cost-effectiveness: Far less expensive than manual testing, making it ideal for frequent use.

Limitations of vulnerability scanning

The effectiveness of vulnerability scanning depends heavily on the capabilities of the tool in use. Some limitations are inherent to automated scanning in general, while others can be addressed with advanced solutions like Invicti:

• False positives: All automated tools carry some risk of false positives, but this can be significantly reduced with proof-based scanning. Invicti automatically confirms exploitability to provide actionable results, minimizing manual verification.
• Lack of context: Basic scanners often lack the ability to assess exploitability or business impact. Advanced tools overcome this with customizable scan profiles and the ability to partly simulate attacker behavior, helping teams prioritize real risks.
• Detection limitations: Scanners are best at finding known, testable types of vulnerabilities. While no scanner can identify every security flaw with complete accuracy, comprehensive DAST solutions can uncover many issues missed by simpler tools.
• Surface-level testing: Many scanners don’t fully mimic real-world attacks. Invicti goes beyond basic payloads to simulate actual exploitation paths, bridging the gap between scanning and traditional penetration testing.
• Authentication challenges: Testing behind login screens or within APIs is a common weak point. Leading DAST tools can support a wide range of authentication methods and session handling to ensure deep, authenticated coverage across applications.

While no scanner can find everything, the right tool can push past many traditional limitations—delivering accurate, in-depth results that are ready for immediate remediation.

What is penetration testing?

Penetration testing is a manual or semi-automated process in which ethical hackers simulate real-world attacks to uncover security flaws in systems, applications, APIs, or networks. Compared to vulnerability scanning, penetration testing is more exploit-focused and designed to assess how vulnerabilities could be leveraged in an actual attack scenario.

Penetration testing is typically more in-depth and tailored to the organization’s environment, making it valuable for understanding real risk exposure beyond what scanners can detect.

Penetration testing tools

While the penetration testing process is largely manual, pentesters use a wide range of specialized tools to accelerate testing or probe deeper into specific vulnerabilities. Common tools include:

• Metasploit: An exploitation framework used to test and validate vulnerabilities.
• Nmap: Used for port scanning and network mapping to identify open services.
• Wireshark: A network protocol analyzer used to inspect packet-level data during testing.
• Kali Linux: A dedicated Linux distribution with dozens of pre-installed pentesting tools.

Notably, pentesting also involves the use of vulnerability scanners for reconnaissance and testing. Apart from the open-source ZAP, two commercial tools are especially favored by many penetration testers, namely Burp Suite by Portswigger (for extensibility and payload customization) and Acunetix by Invicti (for speed and accuracy in reconnaissance).

How much does a penetration test cost?

The cost of a penetration test can vary significantly based on:

• Scope and complexity: Testing a large network or multi-app environment will cost far more than one small web app or website.
• Type of test: Black-box, gray-box, and white-box tests involve different levels of access (from publicly exposed assets only to full knowledge of internal systems) and therefore testing depth and scope.
• Engagement duration: Tests may range from a few days to several weeks, again depending on the defined scope and requirements.
• Testing provider: Established firms or highly skilled consultants will generally command higher rates.
• Internal vs. external provider: Larger organizations will often have dedicated internal security teams to cover some pentesting tasks and complement more expensive external services.

Typical costs range from $4,000 to $25,000 or more, depending on the factors above. For enterprise environments or regulatory compliance (e.g. PCI DSS), costs can far exceed that range.

Benefits of a penetration test

Penetration testing provides several essential benefits:

• Identifies real-world attack paths: Shows how vulnerabilities can be exploited and what damage could occur.
• Validates security controls: Tests how well existing defenses like WAFs, IAM policies, and logging systems hold up.
• Reduces breach risk: Helps proactively fix weaknesses before they’re discovered by attackers.
• Enhances incident response: Reveals how systems would behave during a real intrusion.
• Helps with compliance requirements: Many standards require annual or semi-annual pen tests.

Limitations of a penetration test

While a valuable and mandatory part of any cybersecurity program, penetration testing has its limitations and should always complement, not replace, continuous security monitoring and scanning:

• Time-constrained: Pen tests are usually conducted over a period of several days to several weeks, so intermittent issues might not be found and there won’t always be time to test everything.
• Expensive and resource-intensive: Compared to automated scanning, manual pentesting requires more investment and skilled personnel.
• Limited to a snapshot in time: Any findings only reflect the state of security at the time of testing, so having a positive pentest result from last year doesn’t tell you anything about your current security posture.
• Scope-constrained: Tests are typically limited to what’s agreed upon in the engagement, often leaving many assets untested.
• Only as accurate as the tester: Different pentesters may have different skills, preferences, experience, and tools, so the results of a pentest are highly dependent on who is running it.

Penetration testing vs. vulnerability scanning at a glance

	Penetration testing	Vulnerability scanning
Purpose	Simulates real-world attacks to exploit any weaknesses	Identifies and reports vulnerabilities automatically
Depth	Deep and manual exploration of systems	Broad and automated surface-level scanning
Approach	Human-led (manual or semi-automated)	Fully automated
Skill requirement	Requires skilled ethical hackers	Operated by security analysts or triggered automatically
Testing frequency	Usually periodic (quarterly or annual)	Continuous or scheduled (up to daily or weekly)
Output	Detailed report with exploited paths and risk insights	List of vulnerabilities with severity ratings
Context awareness	High. Testers can understand business logic and app workflows	Low. Scanning based on known patterns and app behaviors
Time & cost	Time-intensive and higher cost	Faster and more cost-effective
Risk validation	Confirms actual risk by performing realistic attacks	Flags potential issues, often without validation (except for tools with automated confirmation)
Use cases	Compliance, red teaming, high-risk environments	Ongoing security hygiene and baseline assessment

How a DAST-first approach deals with the pentesting vs. vulnerability scanning dilemma

While vulnerability scanning and penetration testing each bring value to security programs, a DAST-first strategy, as championed by Invicti, elevates their effectiveness by aligning testing efforts with real, exploitable risk. DAST on the Invicti Application Security Platform works by safely simulating attacks against live applications, similar to a real attacker—or a pentester. It focuses not on theoretical flaws in code but on actual exploitable vulnerabilities in the running software.

With capabilities like proof-based scanning, Invicti validates vulnerabilities automatically, confirming whether they are truly exploitable. This eliminates noise from false positives, which are common in static tools and basic scanners, and gives developers the clarity they need to fix what matters most.

Here’s how operating DAST-first enhances your broader security efforts:

• Prioritizes real risk: Unlike SAST and SCA tools that can overwhelm teams with non-actionable alerts, DAST provides verified findings based on how applications behave in production, helping to fact-check other security testing methods.
• Accelerates remediation: Developers don’t need to waste cycles reproducing issues or chasing down false leads. They get clear, actionable results with evidence of exploitability.
• Supports continuous testing: Invicti DAST fits smoothly into modern DevSecOps pipelines, enabling ongoing assessments rather than waiting for a pentest window or a quarterly scan.

Crucially, a DAST-first strategy doesn’t replace pentesting or other tools but rather makes them more strategic. Pentesters can focus on advanced scenarios and business logic abuse, while vulnerability scans run in the background to monitor for common vulnerabilities as part of daily security hygiene. 

Ultimately, putting DAST at the core of your AppSec program helps ensure that your security efforts are grounded in reality to catch what attackers can actually exploit—and grab the low-hanging vulnerabilities yourself without having to pay pentesters for them.

Frequently asked questions